Taxotere Alopecia

Taxotere is a chemotherapy drug indicated for treatment of breast cancer as well as other cancers such as stomach, prostate and non-small cell lung cancer. However, prior to the upgrade, the tag on Taxotere stated that “hair generally grows taxotere alopecia back” once chemotherapy treatment has been completed. “Everybody expects me to return to normal now that my cancer treatments are over. ” A 2008 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) found no significant difference in survival rates between cancer patients treated with Taxotere and people taking Taxol (generic: pacitaxel), another chemotherapy drug which hasn’t been linked to permanent alopecia. 3% of breast cancer patients grew back less than 50% of the hair after they were given Taxotere, especially when given in combination with Adriamycin (doxorubicin) and Cytoxan (cyclophosphamide). Sanofi sponsored a study called GEICAM 9805.     Currently, there is a litigation consolidated in the Eastern District of Louisiana. How Taxotere Lawsuits Are Filed?

It is thought that if patients were advised of the risk, many might have chosen an alternate drug which did not carry the danger of baldness. Alopecia Universalis — alopecia’s form, presenting as the loss of hair. ” However, it is feared that physicians who were not conscious of the lack of evidence supporting the claims may have continued to favor the drug in treating breast cancer patients with no understanding of the further risk of permanent alopecia. June 6, 2017 — The federal multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 2740) for lawsuits alleging permanent baldness or “alopecia” from Taxotere has grown from only a handful of cases under a year ago to over 1,100 complaints, according to a joint report issued last month. Produced by French pharmaceutical giant, Sanofi-Aventis, Taxotere (docetaxel) was accepted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1996 as a chemotherapy drug to mostly combat breast cancer. Sanofi, et al. (2016). 2 billion in 2004. Plaintiff Ami Dodson claims its affiliates and Sanofi collaborated to increase sales of Taxotere — a plan that caused thousands of cancer patients to suffer hair loss, baldness and alopecia. The risk of permanent Taxotere hair loss was never mentioned until December 2015 when the FDA issued a label change noting that cases of permanent alopecia (hair loss) have been reported.

The plaintiffs also assert that Sanofi hid data and research that linked these adverse side effects and Taxotere. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Close Byetta Celexa Cipro Lawsuit SettlementsFAQs About Cipro Close FAQs About Cipro Close Concerta LawsuitFAQs About Concerta Side Effects CloseEffexorFAQs About Effexor CloseLevaquin Lawsuit SettlementsFAQs About Levaquin CloseGranuFloFAQs About GranuFlo CloseInvokana Lawsuit Claims & SettlementsFAQs About Invokana CloseFosamaxJanumetJanuviaLexaproLipitorOmontys Concerta LawsuitFAQs About Concerta Side Effects Close FAQs About Concerta Side Effects Close EffexorFAQs About Effexor Close FAQs About Effexor Close Levaquin Lawsuit SettlementsFAQs About Levaquin Close FAQs About Levaquin Close GranuFloFAQs Around GranuFlo Close FAQs About GranuFlo Close Invokana Lawsuit Claims & SettlementsFAQs About Invokana Close FAQs About Invokana Close Fosamax Janumet Januvia Lexapro Lipitor Omontys Onglyza Lawsuit Claims SettlementsPlavixPradaxaFAQs About Pradaxa ClosePropeciaFAQs About Propecia CloseProton Pump Inhibitor PPIs lawsuitFAQs About Proton Pump Inhibitors PPIs CloseRisperdalFAQs About Risperdal CloseTaxotere hair loss lawsuitTaxotere Hair Loss AttorneysFacts & FAQs about Taxotere CloseTestosterone therapy Lawsuit Claims & Settlements Blood clots, Heart attack, strokeXarelto LawsuitList of Xarelto Questions Frequently Asked QuestionsFAQs About Xarelto CloseZofranFAQs Around ZofranZofran Birth Defects Lawsuit CloseViagra Skin Cancer LawsuitViagra Claims Evaluation Close Onglyza Lawsuit Claims Settlements Plavix PradaxaFAQs About Pradaxa Close FAQs About Pradaxa Close PropeciaFAQs About Propecia Close FAQs About Propecia Close Proton Pump Inhibitor PPIs lawsuitFAQs Around Proton Pump Inhibitors PPIs Close FAQs About Proton Pump Inhibitors PPIs Close RisperdalFAQs Around Risperdal Close FAQs About Risperdal Close Taxotere baldness lawsuitTaxotere Hair Loss AttorneysFacts & FAQs about Taxotere Close Taxotere Hair Loss Attorneys Facts & FAQs about Taxotere Close Testosterone therapy Lawsuit Claims & Settlements Blood clots, Heart attack, stroke Xarelto LawsuitList of Xarelto Questions Frequently Asked QuestionsFAQs About Xarelto Close List of Xarelto Questions Frequently Asked Questions FAQs About Xarelto Close ZofranFAQs About ZofranZofran Birth Defects Lawsuit Close FAQs About Zofran Zofran Birth Defects Lawsuit Close Viagra Skin Cancer LawsuitViagra Claims Evaluation Close Viagra Claims Assessment Close ProscarProzacSSRI Birth DefectsTestim Lawsuit Claims & Settlements for Blood clots, Heart attack, StrokeTopamaxTylenolFAQs About ViagraVictozaZ-PakZofran Claims CanadaZoloft Proscar Prozac SSRI Birth Defects Testim Lawsuit Claims & Settlements for Blood clots, Heart attack, Stroke Topamax Tylenol FAQs About Viagra Victoza Z-Pak Zofran Claims Canada Zoloft Close. Hattie Carson was among the first plaintiffs to file a claim against Sanofi for failing to warn physicians or patients about the true dangers of permanent or long-term alopecia. The fact that Taxotere failed to disclose that this and was aware of the potential for hair loss that is permanent is of itself grounds for conducting a lawsuit. In men the emotion effect might not be a great as in girls, but the simple fact remains that the producers of Taxotere were negligent in disclosing the fact that around 10% of individuals will experience permanent hair loss. I not sure.

2 percent of women who used the chemo drug suffered permanent alopecia. Scalp alopecia linked to breast cancer: a prospective study of 20 patients. Sometimes, hair may become duller or dryer and will simply become thin. After she had a partial mastectomy, Dodson spoke with her doctor about chemotherapy.

Taxotere is used in combination with other drugs such as capecitabine, cisplatin, fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide to fight off cancer and provide patients with greater survival prices. The doctor assured her that her hair would grow back immediately following completing treatment with the drug; nonetheless, 5 years later and she is still bald. Evidence linking Taxotere side effects to permanent hair loss in breast cancer patients has been mounting for years: “The one side effect possibly most feared by the individual is alopecia,” wrote Dr. Sedlacek. Taxotere falls under a specific class of chemotherapy treatments known as taxane drugs — made from plant alkaloids. Scientific and FDA Studies Regarding Taxotere. Join this Taxotere lawsuit evaluation now by  filling out the form on this page! The following is a list of frequently asked questions (FAQ) about Taxotere, a chemotherapy drug that’s been associated with reports of permanent hair loss (alopecia). Taxotere has also been approved to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), prostate cancer, head and neck cancers, and stomach cancer (gastric adenocarcinoma). Prostate cancer: Taxotere has been approved by the FDA on May 19, 2004 for use in combination with prednisone (a steroid) for the treatment of advanced metastatic prostate cancer. Once their merchandise information was updated, lawsuits began to be filed against them for failing to warn consumers of this devastating risk.

But I can’t. April 18, 2017 — The federal Taxotere litigation (MDL No. 2740) continues to grow at a fast rate, with at least 949 claims filed on behalf of cancer patients who allegedly suffered permanent hair loss or “alopecia” after undergoing chemotherapy with the drug. Retrieved from Potts, J. (2015, September 3). In a nationwide drug lawsuit like the Taxotere cases, the location of the lawyer does not matter. ” Despite this research that is expanding, nobody was telling patients that their breast cancer treatment could leave them permanently hairless. Can alopecia is caused by Taxotere?

Ivc Filter Recall List

She sued for injury, anxiety and impaired ability to earn wages. ivc filter recall list Filing an IVC Filter Lawsuit. He’s an answer to many prayers. Research studies confirm the problems with the IVC filters that are retrievable.

12 months later he complained intense pain in thigh (one of the symptoms of broken filter)- tried to sleep it off and 5 hours later died at the same hospital which installed the filter. G2 Express blockers, the Recovery, G2 and combined have a 12 percent fracture rate, a study revealed. Research: Perforation, Fracture, Embolization from Cook Retrievable IVC Filters. So, I strongly urge anyone who is in similar circumstances with an IVC filter to contact Dr Kuo. Still pain.

“And the negligent manufacturer should do the right thing and compensate those who were injured as a result of the wrongdoing. Bard never recalled the Retrieval filter, rather replacing the model with the series in 2005, only three years after the Recovery had been introduced to the marketplace. , et al, 1:14-cv-6016 (Celect) The initial Cook IVC filter bellwether trial lasted three weeks and returned an unanimous verdict for the company on Nov. Through an IVC filter lawsuit, people who have experienced a fracture, migration or failure of the apparatus might have the ability to receive compensation from the manufacturer as a result of the defective and allegedly negligent design of those products. The latest trial to make it through the court system ended in January of 2015 with a settlement. Published in Ring of Fire – Blood Clot Filter Dangers. Since the debut of IVC filter in 2005, the FDA has received thousands of adverse reports involving these filters. However, many lawsuits have been filed claiming that the manufacturers continue to move forward with sales of these filters of these filters have not satisfied security concerns and, instead. IVC filters are meant for them. and Cook Medical Inc.

After operation, Brand found the Celect filter had legs, according to her lawsuit. Studies have confirmed that Bard G2 IVC filter and the Bard Recovery IVC filter have other issues and a speed or failures that might lead to serious and potentially life-threatening injuries. For them, an IVC filter can’t prevent blood clots from forming, but a blood clot can be prevented by it from blocking and reaching the pulmonary artery. A confidential study commissioned by Bard revealed that the Retrieval filter had higher degrees of relative risk for death, filter fracture and motion than all of its competitors. Due to improper warnings and instructions, many doctors were not conscious of the importance of removing the IVC filters. All I was told was a filter was needed by me and was told it was removable, due to my Hx of PE’s. Problems with the designs of certain inferior vena cava (IVC) filters have caused many people nationwide to suffer severe complications and injuries when the tiny devices fractured or broke inside the body. Cook Medical, Inc. In 16 courts, 22 actions were filed at the time.

Lisa Davis sued Bard after a filter migrated and fractured in 2008 to her heart, causing ongoing heart difficulties. Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement Does Not Result in a Survival Benefit for Trauma Patients. Were you or a loved one injured by an IVC filter? The lawsuit claims Cook concealed the “known risks and failed to warn of known or scientifically knowable dangers. Kuo said he has removed Bard filters {than any other make of filter.|. IVC filter lawsuits are scheduled to go to trial in 2017. ” His ruling pointed out that Bard’s IVC filters had been approved through the FDA’s 510(k) process. et al.

IVC filters are connected to dozens of deaths and hundreds of injuries. Attorneys argue that C.R. Bard (the maker) hid the results of its own research which found that the filter dangerous, and even forged a worker\’s signature on an FDA application so as to get approval. Perforation of the IVC: rule rather after indwelling times for the Günther Tulip and Celect retrievable filters. In 2015, the FDA sent a warning letter to Bard’s Chairman and CEO Timothy M. Ring after inspectors found violations at the company’s facilities in Tempe, Arizona, and Queensbury, New York. Did Blood-Clot Filter Used on tens of thousands of Americans Have a Fatal Flaw?

Recreational Boating/Fishing/Diving

Thousands of people spend their summers out on the boat fishing, deep sea diving or just hanging out with family or friends. They may spend time on the lake or river where they can relax and enjoy the beautiful water views. However, risk for accidents in this scenario is greater than many people believe.

Navigating a boat on a river or lake or in a harbor or along a coastline can be difficult, especially with hundreds of other boats moving along as well. Boat operators must be governed by rules similar to a person operating a vehicle on the road. They may have to deal with speeding vessels, operators who are impaired by alcohol or drugs as well as collisions and hit and runs. Complicating the situation are factors such as faulty equipment and inexperienced crew members.

Boats of all kinds face these dangers, including canoes, kayaks, sail boats, fishing boats, yachts and charter vessels. An enjoyable afternoon on the water can quickly turn serious and even deadly when an accident occurs. A person may suffer serious injuries from a fall overboard, a slip and fall accident, a collision with another vessel or other scenarios. They may suffer traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, burns, broken bones, and even internal injuries that result in long-term damage and an extended recovery time.

If a person is injured while out on a boat or other sea vessel, they should contact an attorney to find out if they are eligible for merchant marine litigation. They may be entitled to receive compensation for their injuries as payment for medical treatment and lost wages which resulted from the accident. If someone dies out on the water, their family may be entitled to death benefits for their loss. The Merchant Marine Act of 1920 was put in place to protect people out on the ocean, rivers and lakes.

Laws Regarding Skiing and Snowboarding Accident Injuries

Skiing and snowboarding are two popular sports, especially with people who enjoy spending time outdoors. Like all sports, they can be dangerous with the risk of accidents. Whether you are a beginner or a seasoned pro, you may suffer an injury while out on the slopes.

Accidents and Injuries

An accident can happen at a moment’s notice. You may be skiing downhill when you notice another skier who is trying some dangerous stunts on a beginner’s trail. A sign pointing you to turn may have fallen over, so you end up going in the wrong direction and falling down an embankment.

While many injuries are unavoidable, others may be preventable. Ski resorts have a responsibility to maintain the equipment so that nothing malfunctions and causes an accident. If they fail to take all necessary precautions and provide a safe environment within their capabilities, they may be held liable for any injuries caused by their negligence,  

Injuries commonly seen with skiing and snowboarding accidents include torn ligaments and tendons from a wrong turn or twisting a knee, broken bones or dislocated limbs from a fall, concussions and other brain trauma from falling or being hit by an object, and spinal injuries. Some of these may be minor and require only a few days of rest. Other injuries may be severe and even permanent.

If you or a loved one has been injured in a skiing or snowboarding accident, you should the legal advice of an experienced attorney like They can help you determine if you have the grounds for a lawsuit. You may be entitled to compensation for your injuries, such as the costs of medical care as well as any lost income from not being able to work while you recovered. A lawyer can focus on the legal aspect of your claim while you work on recovery.

How Complex Can a Property Damage Lawsuit Be, Anyways?

When you think of people going to court over a property damage dispute, you probably imagine one person doing some act that causes the other person to suffer some sort of loss, and of course you would be right. Surely, this type of situation shouldn’t involve a complex legal battle, and usually, it doesn’t. But what happens when damage is being done and you lack the evidence to prove whose fault it was. This is where these types of cases can get really complex really quick. Click here for more.

Take for example an Ok oil earthquake property damage lawsuit. The plaintiffs whose property is being damaged by tremblors, aftershocks, and large quakes are alleging that energy companies are causing quakes by high pressure injection of waste deep into the earth, Each person who believes this process is causing the quakes that are damaging their property could file a lawsuit seeking compensation for their losses among other things. Click here. However, if all the property owners who are being affected would join together in mass tort, they may be more successful with their fight for justice.
Part of the reason mass tort actions can be quite successful is because of how much harder is to deny allegations when a large group individuals stand united in making them. Click here or read more about mass tort litigations and how complex property damage cases can actually be, at Complex Litigation and Mass Tort | Harvard Law School Complex Litigation and Mass Tort. More information can be found at California Bar Journal – March 1997.

Copyright © 2014 All Rights Reserved.